Archive for the ‘business’ Category

It’s the photographer’s fault.

Tuesday, February 5th, 2008

I was thinking this morning about pictures and the common experience that so many people have as it pertains to getting them/taking them/having them etc., and I’ve come to conclusion that many of the sentiments that people have surrounding pictures has more to do with the photographers than the people. If we are historians and documenters of the past for future use, the onus is upon us to provide an experience that clients and end-users can cherish and enjoy, even to the point of enjoying the actual experience.

(more…)

interesting.

Wednesday, January 23rd, 2008

Apple is making money. Info courtesy of one of my favorite tech blogs, Engadget. Interesting how they had to make 9.6B to walk away with 1.58B.

You don’t know my expenses, I gotta buy bigger plates…

Good ol’ cost of doing business for you.  Looks like Apple’s is somewhere in the 8B range. What’s yours?

this may not come across as being about photography…

Monday, January 14th, 2008

But it does speak to the issue of art-meets-business matters that exist with the advent of digital photography.

You can read here and here if you’re a reader, I’ll couch the discussion with those two writings as references. Good stuff over there at roughlydrafted.com.

Up for discussion is the impact of digital, and a discourse on it’s implications for everything else. Conversations with friends often rested on the premise that the music industry was suffering because the internet was burgeoning and the monolithic record company was too stubborn to change its ways, insisted upon defending and protecting its stronghold of music tooth and nail, and effectively fell on its sword in the process (as Chase Jarvis would put it at that Photoshelter town meeting last September).

!! Man! It’s really a new year! Last September seems like so long ago… but I digress

What the good folks over at Roughly point out, however are some other not-so-highlighted trends in the industry that had their impact as well. Namely, the ability of an Apple Inc to address a consumer need (portability of content– not necessarily high quality), and a trend among record stores to get as much as they could for records while the Walmarts and Targets dished discs on the cheap just to get people in the door. Interesting.

People didn’t stop listening to music, and they didn’t stop buying it.

Very provocative article in the context of photography mind you. Begs the question of the photographer (or studio)’s ability to address the needs of the consumer. Do they really care about the megapixels or even the saturated colors? Or do they just want good pictures? Reliability perhaps and a pleasant photo experience?
Wheels turning.

People are still buying good pictures everyday (in various forms– magazines for one; yes people pick up magazine covers because of the photos that are printed on them just as much as the content found inside), but are we playing like the Sony’s and the Microsoft’s pushing them to something that really doesn’t matter to them (noting the aforementioned discourse on low-definition television versus high, and all that content folks are watching on youtube and ipods…)? The proliferation of digital cameras (as I’ve heard mentioned on so many forums), or even the availability of lower-cost-higher-megapixel-chippped-slr’s is not chasing away the photo client market. If anything, it’s presenting an opportunity for a great resurgence of appreciation for what photographer’s do. And do it, we must if you’re worth your weight in talent or business-savvy.

And it won’t get us anywhere to focus on trying to take them to places they can handle autonomously. (Here, have a look at this high-quality picture that you don’t care enough to chuck all your dvd’s to adopt..). Are we meeting them where they stand? Or trying to force them into running after a dangling carrot that no reasonable cause exists to go after?

I guess we’ll all see soon enough.

Or not.

WOM

Monday, January 7th, 2008

Word of mouth. Gotta be the best marketing yet. Few things are ever so viral, organic, and rich.

I had a wonderful client from last summer that apparently was showing off their album over the holiday, and I had the good fortune to receive an inquiry from one of their friends about designing their wedding album. I’m humbled to say the least.

Here’s the book they saw.

What’s in a brand?

Sunday, December 23rd, 2007

It’s been a most interesting experience creating/conceiving/starting a business. I remember when I first used to think of how working for myself would be better than working for someone else. After all, that was the original cry. How it came to be colored with overtures of being more like Mercedes-Benz rather than Hyundai, or the boutique rather than the bargain basement has most recently captivated my attention. Perhaps I’ve been plugged into the community too much at the expense of diluting my own thoughts and ideals? Of course, there is something to be embraced about premium product, cutting-edge marketing, or the sense of giving or having “the best.” But what about the relics of “common availability” that still continue to boldly saturate the landscape?

I’m pressed to ask myself if branding was most important from the beginning? Did I even have a brand working for someone else? Was making “so much” or “all this money” what was important from the beginning? I remember telling myself if I never made a cent more than I made working [retail for someone else], but I was working for myself: making my own hours, calling my own vacations, defining my own policies, and representing things the way I would prefer them to, I would’ve been happy. Now I’m forced to ask myself, Where is that guy now?

The guy who would’ve happily taken pictures just because, not because this job or that job would’ve fetched a greater earning, or because these prints packaged this way can get this, but because what I’d be doing for whatever reason was going to be far more satisfying, enjoyable, and fulfilling. It’s amusing how the analogical references always distinguish between high and low, when the rest of the human experience seems to cry out for middle ground. You never hear religious overtures for people to spend life in purgatory, there’s only heaven and hell. Rich and poor, hot and cold, best and worse. And of course, we all want to sit atop the mountain because apparently there’s no glory in the billions to be had by the Walmarts of the world (Let’s be honest, we don’t have the capital necessary to be that cheap, right? Is that really the only thing stopping us?)

At the eve of a new year, I find myself revisiting what really matters. This handful of months has been a rollercoaster of emotions, perspectives, ideas, reflections, and revelations. Not much different from this first semester I’ve completed of graduate study.

And yet, the question remains. Where do I stand with my branding? How will I represent myself? Is it to be luxurious, one-of-kind, and worth every penny (note here the consumer is scraping the pennies, not me)? Or is it to be full of value, decked out in quality, and within reach of even the common man? Speculation says the middle class is eroding and middle of the road marketing is the way of the “gone-out-of” business.

To self: Should I even be soul-searching on my blog? I think yes. It’s a necessary part of doing business. And that’s what I’ve committed to doing. And the time has come for doing (the ever-glorious point of difficulty). The answers can’t all possibly come before doing occurs.

It’s long overdue.

Copy

Friday, December 21st, 2007

I need to edit the copy for the bio section of my website apparently the consensus says it was too wordy. And kinda the opposite of confident.

Do tell.

A working definition of success

Friday, December 21st, 2007

What is success?

Is it winning? Is it not coming in dead last? Or is it just giving breath to a vision, making a bit of progress in a given direction, or crossing off 3 out of 5 goals on a list?

The hackers say small steps are not a problem for big goals. Simple Dollar says be specific. The Bible says to ‘write the vision.’ So what is it?

Month’s ago I spoke to some 8th graders about whether or not it was having the DB9 in the garage beneath the hardwood-floored bedroom with the $3-7K mattress

Here’s the fun part.

That’s for you to decide. But whatever you side. Make sure you remember what it is.

New beginnings?

Thursday, December 20th, 2007

It seems like I’ve been perpetually beginning. Maybe that’s just the freshness of ideas coupled with the fear of failure.

Whatever the case it’s high time we moved on to something new, something consistent, and something real. To that end, I’m looking at selling these two 30D camera bodies (with grips) and the best lens to fit on those bodies, the 17-55 f/2.8 IS (either that, or it’ll be one of the bodies with said lens). I want the 5D. Screw the speculation of a new body. All this ogling at gear hasn’t afforded much for anyone except the manufacturers. Time is to be better spent shooting.

It should be fun taking pictures of each camera with the other :).

Copyright? A spec in the sands of time?

Thursday, December 20th, 2007

Copyright Law. Creatives swear by it. It secures the livelihood of many, allows businesses a basis for profit, and appears to be the scourge of the civilian (just check the comment thread).

Are creatives crying over spilled milk? Is business in for a paradigm shift in this era of information and content? Is it all just greed?

I’m with Lane Hartwell. But my eye is on the shoreline. I think it was Mr. Jarvis (see 34:41) that said we’d have to start thinking different.